Advocacy / Politics

House Committee on Ways and Means Holds Hearing to Discuss Social Security

By – Kathleen Spillane

On Tuesday, July 29th, 2014 the House Committee on Ways and Means held a hearing titled “What Workers Need to Know about Social Security as They Plan for their Retirement”. Chairman Sam Johnson (TX) began the hearing by noting that the Social Security Board of Trustees “provide an annual financial check up.” That check-up report was released on Monday, July 28th and Rep. Johnson concurred that it “sounded the alarm over Social Security’s financial health”.  According to the Board of Trustees report, by 2033 retirement and survivor benefits will be cut by 23%. The Chairman’s Opening Statement pushed not only the Committee, but Congress as an entire body, to address Social Security’s financial crisis. “Unless Congress does its job…full benefits can’t be paid…beginning in just two yeas for those receiving disability benefits.” Chairman Johnson stressed that the reforms will be far larger than previous changes enacted by Congress, such as a series of reforms passed in 1983, as Americans need sound retirement planning and a Social Security System that they can understand and that serves, rather than burdens them. AMAC is working tirelessly on Capitol Hill to achieve the substantive reforms Social Security needs so that benefits will be preserved for years to come, and Americans will have retirement funds they may rely on. These reforms are needed sooner rather than later.

The hearing featured six witnesses. The first, Dr. Blahous, is a Public Trustee on the Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees. In his testimony, Dr. Blahous highlighted these specific points:

  • First was the major financing shortfall facing Social Security, with part of this shortfall, namely short term disability benefits, being an immediate problem.
  • Secondly, there is vast uncertainty as to how these financial issues will be resolved. “The longer we delay, the larger the relative sacrifice”, Dr. Blahous said, as less people will prepare for the sharp decline in benefits that would inevitably occur if Social Security’s finances continue to suffer.
  • Dr. Blahous’ third point was that, additionally, the longer we wait to reform Social Security the more difficult it becomes to execute these reforms within the traditional framework of the system. In waiting too long to act, the opportunity to properly reform Social Security while preserving its historic structure may disappear. One rather bleak perspective was that, if in 2033 significant reform hasn’t been enacted “even cutting all benefits wouldn’t solve the problem”.

Another witnesses, Dr. Steurle, the Institute Fellow and Richard B. Fischer Chair at the Urban Institute, testified that the is an increasing number of middle-aged Americans who are retiring earlier than in past decades. The current system, created in the early 20th century, did not anticipate both a decade longer retirement period and a longer life expectancy. Now, “a third of the adult population for a third or more of their adult lives” will be receiving Social Security benefits. Social Security thus does not currently have in place “a financial system that can provide so many retirement benefits for so long and to so many without a depletion of resources”. A delay in reform, Dr. Steurle stressed, will be detrimental to the increasing number of future retirees.

In the final three witnesses’ testimonies, Dr. Entmacher, Vice President for Family Economic Security of the National Women’s Law Center, addressed the disproportionate number of elderly women who may face poverty in retirement and also underscored that for two thirds of seniors, Social Security represents 50% of their retirement income, and for others, a third of their retirement income. Dr. Andrew Biggs of the American Enterprise Institute emphasized that the state of retirement security is “substantially better than you may think” and that Congress “should not panic…and pass far reaching policy changes in haste” but did note that Social Security will reach insolvency in 2030, and that the long term deficit has quadrupled in the past 4 to 5 years.

In the question and answer session of the hearing, Rep. Tiberi (OH) inquired as to whether certain Senate proposals to raise the cap on payroll taxes would have any effect on the failing financial state of Social Security. Dr. Biggs stated that “we would be worse off if we raised the tax max(imum) on payroll taxes”, and that in addition we cannot promise additional benefits without paying for those benefits which were already promised to retirees. Chairman Johnson asked Dr. Blahous what the true nature of the financial shortfall is, and he responded that “a quarter of the benefits are not financed or people’s tax revenues are short by a third of what they need to be to fund promised benefits”.

AMAC is working to preserve Social Security benefits for hard working citizens across America, and you can learn more about AMAC’s “Social Security Guarantee”, which details our proposal to reform Social Security and protect benefits, by visiting the “About” Section of our website or by visiting

Click Here to View as PDF

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
T. A. Landis
8 years ago

There is a simple change that could be instituted to the social security benefits program that would save the government money and at the same time allow the people more freedom of choice concerning the use of THEIR benefits.

Simply, Remove or raise the earnings restriction for early retirement between 62 and 66.

If people take the early retirement and live beyond 78-79, the government will save money in the total lifetime payout of benefits. If people are allowed to continue working past 62 they will continue to contribute more to the income tax base.

At the same time this change will allow people more flexibility in making their decision on when to begin collecting THEIR money back from the government.

8 years ago

Mark W….Tempers are high because of the high debt and that is understandable but the Liberal media & Democrats are pushing the idea that it is all the fault of “baby boomers” so John & his friends are just repeating what they hear (and maybe they should check out how the Social Security funds were stolen by another Democrat President in the past before spouting off & blaming Senior Citizens). Who they should really be angry at is the Obama administration who’s spending has increased the debt to record highs since taking office in 2008 (and not because of Social Security).

Why aren’t these people complaining about all the YOUNG, STRONG, ABLE BODIED people who have been on welfare, food stamps & other welfare programs their whole lives but have NEVER CONTRIBUTED to pay for any of the FREE things they get? Why are SENIOR CITIZENS targeted as the cause of all this debt when THEY DID WORK & CONTRIBUTE to not only Social Security but ALSO THEIR TAXES PAID to SUPPORT these young, strong able, bodied PEOPLE ON WELFARE? Why aren’t they complaining about all the illegals who are receiving food stamps, medical care (& all of that is through emergency rooms which is 3-4 times higher than private care) and having their babies paid for all out of the taxes hard WORKING citizens contribute? You, John & his friends need to take a look at the bigger picture instead of just listening to the Liberal medial and being angry with “baby boomers”. You are just playing into the hands of Obama & his administration as they try to manipulate public opinion to what they want you to believe.

You are correct when you say it’s not a Conservative vs Liberal or Republican vs Democrat issue. However, to SINGLE OUT “baby boomers/senior citizens” as the largest contributor to the debt is not fair either. Maybe Social Security needs fixing & the best way to do that is get it out of the hands of the Federal Government & greedy Politicians. Social Security is no a welfare system but the TRUE welfare systems does need to be fixed along with all the over bloated departments in our government. Thinks of how much money that would save and help cut down on the debt.

Mark W.
8 years ago

There is no courage in Congress to act on Social Security reform, and none will happen until it is at the precipice of collapse. Pressure must be mounted… and, most likely, sound solutions will have to come jointly from outside organizations like AMAC & AARP, with support of their memberships.

People of younger ages are already angry and are voicing their dissatisfaction: here’s a “millennial-age” Yahoo commenter named John from yesterday: “We should cut off the baby boomers social security. Its the biggest driver of our debt and we can’t afford it. They are the one’s most responsible for our debt. Baby boomers have been kicking the can down the road the longest. They could never agree on a long term solution to fix or pay for social security. The CBO says the debt will surge past 23 trillion when they are all in retirement just to pay for this social welfare program. We can’t take on debt to pay for there irresponsibility. They should take out reverse mortgages, live off there savings and if need be get 200 dollars in food stamps which is would be a lot cheaper than a full soc. sec. check.” And someone else added: “John is right! Baby Boomers are the locusts that will devour this nation.” And others showed approval with their “thumbs up” votes.

When a tipping point comes, it may be too late to act. Now is the time for sensible, thoughtful consideration of the problems and solutions… for building alliances… and working from the grass roots level to influence our Congressional delegations to face the hard decisions with bipartisan sponsorship.

This is not a Conservative vs. Liberal issue; it is not a Republican vs. Democrat issue. It is an issue that affects all Americans and it must be addressed as such.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x